RealTimeChem Day – All you need to know for the big day.

Hello everyone!

It is now just a week until #RealTimeChem hopefully takes over twitter. The response so far has been pretty enthusiastic and I’m looking forward to all the chemistry that’s going to be on show for the world to see!

Seeing as there isn’t long to go and a few people have been asking for more detail, I have produced an FAQ section so that you everyone knows the how, when, who, what and why of #RealTimeChem day.

So…what is RealTimeChem Day?

Real Time Chemistry day is a twitter based event where chemists from all over the world will be tweeting about their daily lives in chemistry… in real time.

Ooookay….why?

Chemistry often gets short shrift when it comes to media exposure and that’s a bit sad. So Real Time Chem Day will be a day to celebrate chemistry and give the world an insight into the kinds of work and the science that we do as chemists every day. It will also hopefully help to connect the chemistry community and spark intriguing discussions and it’s just pretty darn fun to see what other chemists are up to!

Interesting! …When is it?

It’s on the 7th November 2012 and lasts for the whole 24 hours.

Who can take part?

Anybody in the world who works in the field we call “chemistry”. As long as you are tweeting about part of your everyday life that involves doing chemistry then it counts – lab work, journal reading, writing papers, teaching, demonstrating, field work, instrumental work etc.

This is an all inclusive event no matter what branch of chemistry that you partake in (including biochemistry! Geochemistry! Astrochemistry! Crystallography!) or what level of chemistry you are currently at (High school! Undergraduate! Postgraduate! Industrial! Person in shed!).

Please though only join in if you can spare the time. I understand that you’re all busy people – work commitments and getting our chemistry done must take priority.

What do I have to do to join in? What should I tweet?

To join in you simply have to tweet about your day in your particular field of chemistry using the hashtag #RealTimeChem to show that it is part of the event.

As for what you tweet, well that is entirely at your discretion so long as it’s got some link to doing chemistry. In my case, I will be tweeting about actual chemistry I am performing in the laboratory.

All things that happen on the day can be tweeted, good or bad. I’m sure the former shall outweigh the latter, but we should be giving everyone an accurate view of what happens.

Incidentally, pictures of your day (such as great looking experiments) are most welcome. Obviously, only take pictures of things you are allowed to show, we understand some chemistry must be shrouded in secrecy.

Please feel free to engage with other #RealTimeChem tweeters and start a conversation. This is a day for chemists to unite and enjoy what they do.

How much do I have to tweet?

As much or as little as you want to, even if it is just one tweet. So long as it includes the hashtag #RealTimeChem it’ll count.

So just feel free to randomly tweet your chemistry as you go along, this day is for you to share what you do with the rest of the world.

How can I follow the event?

Search for the hashtag #RealTimeChem on twitter or follow @RealTimeChem for highlights. I’ll be keeping an eye on twitter all day and re-tweeting every #RealTimeChem tweet I can (or as many as twitter will allow!) and commenting on the fabulous things you are doing.

Who invented #RealTimeChem?

Certainly not me. However, I have been participating for a while on an off in doing some #RealTimeChem tweets. I believe that the inventor was @azmanam who was trying to determine what was in Lemishine and happened to tweet his results using, and @JessTheChemist produced a storify page to follow all the RealTimeChem that happened. Since then it has caught on a many others have joined in to tweet their chemical reactions in real time using the same hash tag.

I think we all agreed that tweeting about laboratory chemistry was such fun that it would be nice to have a #RealTimeChem day to celebrate, and here we are!

Why is #RealTimeChem day on 7th November?

This is the birthday of Marie Curie, the first woman to win the Nobel Prize and the only to win it in two separate fields, chemistry and physics.

If you want to do something extra fantastic on the day please feel free to donate to Marie Curie Cancer Care.

Who is running #RealTimeChem?

Mainly the same person who runs this blog, “Doctor Galactic and The Lab Coat Cowboy” who can be found under the name @doctor_galactic on twitter and also @RealTimeChem. I’m a post doctoral researcher in the UK, who is just coming to the end of his contract. For me this is possibly one last hurrah before looking toward chemistry pastures new.

In addition to the @RealTimeChem feed, @JessTheChemist will be continuing to update her storify page and www.chemistry-blog.com will be showing #RealTimeChem tweets in their Chemistry twitterverse box.

Anyone else who wants to post anything about #RealTimeChem on their blog or anywhere else is most welcome to so long as they refer back to @RealTimeChem somewhere.

Can I help to promote #RealTimeChem day?

Sure thing, just retweet any information you want regarding the event and mention it to your chemistry friends on twitter. Even mention it to your chemistry friends outside of twitter. The more chemists we get to tweet, the more chemistry we get to enjoy!

There are a couple of posters that have been uploaded on @RealTimeChem with some more to come this week. So feel free to use these as you will or make your own!

What’s with the “24” theme?

It felt particularly relevant to the nature of the day. We are all Jack Bauer on #RealTimeChem Day, we just do chemistry.

I want to do something really spectacular, can I?

Yes, so long as you are safe. All the normal rules of chemistry apply, including the use of PPE (Personal Protective Equipment). We don’t want anybody to get hurt doing something on #RealTimeChem day.

I don’t want to tweet but I want to watch, can I?

Of course! If you don’t want to tweet you can still watch the rest of us on twitter. The best bet is to follow @RealTimeChem which will be re-tweeting as many highlights as possible.

What will happen afterwards?

I plan to sift through the tweets and make a series of blog posts highlighting my favourites here on this blog. The real point of the day is to have some fun and get chemistry out there for the world to see, so that will hopefully be its own reward.

Will there be future #RealTimeChem days?  

Everyday can be #RealTimeChem day if you so choose it. The hashtag is there to use whenever you are doing any chemistry. If the event itself is popular enough, then most certainly we’ll try to organise another full day in the future. I would like to make it an annual event and perhaps expand it to cover a whole week. The possibilities are endless.

Any other questions? Then drop me a line in the comments box on here or via twitter @RealTimeChem.

Enjoy the day, I’m looking forward to it!

 

 

-Doctor Galactic and The Lab Coat Cowboy-

Advertisements

The Chemistry of the Dark Knight (Part 2)

Disclaimer: Obviously, I don’t own BatmanTM or any of the other stuff discussed in this blog post. This is just for fun, so Warner Brothers and DC, please don’t sue. The same goes for all the owners of any trademarked compounds mentioned or any other intellectual property, especially you George.

Second disclaimer: Many of the compound mentioned in this blog post are extremely dangerous. I do not endorse the use of any of this stuff. Batman is a fictional crime fighter, so don’t go getting any ideas.

From this point onwards, there be potential spoilers for The Dark Knight trilogy. You’ve been warned.

Welcome to the second part of my look at some of the chemistry at work in the adventures of the intrepid Dark Knight. In the previous part, I got somewhat wrapped up in the materials used to make the Batsuit. This time I’ll be focusing on his gadgets (and a few other bits and bobs I just randomly threw in).

“I’m Batman”

The Dark Knight Rises…and Rides and Flies and Glides and….

Just imagine that line in a husky voice and if you’re the kind of geek I think you are then you’re probably getting tingles. He’s not the hero we need, but the hero we deserve…or something like that. He’s not a superpowered alien from across the cosmos, he’s just your average orphan-billionaire-genius-playboy  turned crime-fighting vigilante. Without superpowers Batman relies on other things and Batman wouldn’t be Batman if he didn’t have his trusty utility belt, filled to the brim with all manner of useful gadgets to help him battle the scum of Gotham City.

So the question is:

Where does he get What Chemistry is invovled in all of those wonderful toys…?”

Even the Joker asked this (kind of). Look. He’s relaxing with a martini in anticipation.

I’ve generally been focusing on Christopher Nolan’s version of Batman, being that his is the most “gritty and realistic” (not to mention recent) version of the character on film thus far. Even though there have been some changes over the years, certain elements of Batman’s arsenal have stayed the same.

That’s still less belts than worn by your average Final Fantasy character.

As such, some of the gadgets discussed below naturally overlap with other versions of the Batman and there are all kinds of wacky things that I could cover from the past, but that we don’t have time for.

On the plus side, there won’t be room to talk about any of the ridiculous “gadgets” in Batman & Robin; the less said about that film the better.

I said no Arnie. Objection overruled!

So let’s start with the basics….

Batarangs

Bats we all know you aren’t gonna use that thing. Put it away.

Probably the single most iconic Batman gadget is fairly boring in Christopher Nolan’s universe (so we’ll skip right along). Having originally been more like their namesake, the boomerang, they’ve tended toward being more shuriken-like recently (which is more in keeping with Batman’s ninja like fighting style).

In other films, the batarang has been remote (Batman Returns) and sonar controlled (Batman Forever), whilst the comics and other interpretations of the character have included explosive, cryogenic and electrically charged variants.

Making Batarangs the Nolan way. Like. You know, realistically.

So Nolan’s batarang is basically a modern shuriken, which are these days mostly made of lightweight stainless steel and are commercially available (apparently) in Europe and parts of America. I should point out that unless you are a trained ninja or…you know, Batman, you should leave those well alone.

Throughout the Dark Knight Trilogy, Batman has used Batarangs to smash windows, knock out lights or act as distraction; however despite being like shuriken we don’t actually see him use these for offensive purposes. Similar smaller projectiles are used against Bane’s henchmen in The Dark Knight Rises (more on those later), but a traditional batarang is never used for preventing criminals escaping (this makes me a little sad inside).

So is there chemistry involved in them? …A little.

A blog post of mine wouldn’t be complete without a picture of some generic metal rods would it? If you didn’t come up with a joke about rods the first time, nows your chance.

Stainless steel is quite a well known alloy of iron, carbon and chromium (where chromium content is greater than 10.5%). It gets the name “stainless” because unlike normal steel it rusts far less being much more resistant to oxidation (i.e. the formation of iron oxide) and corrosion.

I said chromium…Not chrome. Blooming Google taking over the world….

Anyway….so why include chromium (symbol Cr, Atomic number 24)? Well, when exposed to oxygen in the air, chromium very rapidly reacts to form a layer of chromium (III) oxide (Cr2O3) upon its surface. The layer is invisible to the human eye, being only several atoms thick and therefore translucent so the metal beneath stays all nice and shiny.

This oxide layer is impervious to water and air and passive towards oxidizing acids such as nitric or hydrochloric. Thanks to this layer anything beneath is protected, which is why chrome-plated items are useful and even fashionable.

Oooh shiny AND weird.

Inclusion of chromium in stainless steel essentially adds these useful property to the alloy. This “passivation” is also seen when other reactive metals are used, such as aluminium.

So no worries about those Batarangs going rusty, eh Brucey?

You know…making these is hard. I think I’ll just use other stuff. A lot.

Smoke pellets

So batarangs are pretty boring. You’re probably snoozing comfortably now, so best to wake you up with a bang. A little background first though.

So Henri Ducard….

Everyone loves Liam Neeson.

Also known as….*big spoiler alert*…

Qui-Gon Jinn….I mean Ra’s Al Ghul… teaches Bruce in Batman Begins about being a Jedi Knight…sorry!… ninja assassin and the powerful tools of “theatricality and deception”. As part of this he tells Bruce that the League of Shadows employ explosive powders for means of distraction. Bruce then throws some non-descript black powder on the floor and viola instant smoke bomb.

I doubt Batmans smoke balls are quite so….happy.

Batman most likely crafts this black powder into smoke balls, which are little hollow spheres made of clay or cardboard, that are filled with a series of chemicals that when mixed and ignited produce a large volume of smoke for between 10 -15 seconds.

These are pretty easy to make at home, especially for the “goddamn Batman”. However I do not advocate this to you kids (and grown-up kids) out there and would prefer it if no badness ensued.

See? I don’t even make the rules.

One type of smoke bomb is made by mixing KNO3 (potassium nitrate, sometimes called saltpeter), sodium bicarbonate (baking soda to moderate the heat of the reaction) and sugar (usually sucrose or dextrin from ping-pong balls) with some light heating to give a gum with a peanut-butter-like consistency. You pour this into a bit of foil or a mould (shape and size are variable – you could make them Bat shaped!) and let it set, then peel the thing out.

The smoke bomb can be lit directly (not that I’d recommend it) or via a fuse, stand well back and its smoke screen time. The chemical equation for the reaction process as follows is

10 KNO3 + C12H22O11 → 5 K2CO3 + 7 CO2 + 11H2O + 5N2.

That generates quite a lot of gas!

Batman making a speedy get away in the excellent Arkham City video game.

You might have noticed that Batman’s smoke bombs are generally ignited by impact rather than him pulling out a lighter. For ignition of the smoke bomb on impact, a very tiny amount (~0.08 mg) of Silver fulminate (AgCNO) can be used as an ignition source. It’s the stuff used in Christmas Crackers and Bang Snaps to give that characteristic supersonic shockwave “crack” that you hear.

Silver fulminate: Anyone who knows their chemistry knows that doesn’t look like a nice, happy compound.

Silver fulminate has very little practical value because it is so extremely sensitive to impact to impact, heat, pressure and even electricity. In fact, the more of the compound that you aggregate the more sensitive it becomes, storing anything larger than a few milligrams is actually impossible as the compound will basically self-detonate under its own weight.

In the case of bang snaps, the tiniest amount of silver fulminate is mixed with gravel, which acts as a buffer to the high-explosive detonation, which means they can’t produce physical damage, even if discharged directly against the skin. The shell of the smoke bomb would likely contain a few of these devices, or alternatively a huge bunch of match heads, which will happily ignite (seeing as they contain phosphorus or phosphorus sesquisulfide).

This engraving at the Royal Institution showing ECH, between geologist William Smith and chemist William Allen.

Edward Charles Howard was the first person to discover “fulminating silver” along with a large variety of other fulminates, which are all explosives. After many injuries (unsurprisingly), he went on to studying meteorites and eventually got involved in the sugar industry which ultimately caused his death. In 1816 he suffered fatal heat stroke from visiting the oven of the sugar refinery that he owned. This NOT being the DC or Marvel universe, he sadly didn’t turn into “sugar man”.

Bat-bombs (& other explosives)

Bat bombs!

Aside from smoke bombs, Batman quite clearly has a few other types in his arsenal. In Batman Begins he blows up a wall in Arkham Asylum to escape from SWAT and get Rachael Dawes back to the Batcave.

Much to the surprise of these gormless idiots.

So what’s in these little guys to make them blow up a whole wall? They are impact grenades of some kind and probably not all that dissimilar from your standard frag grenade (a nasty invention).

A grenade rather simplistically consists of an outer shell, usually made of steel, containing an explosive and a fuse for ignition purposes that has a short burning time. The explosive is generally something called “Composition B”.

Composition B consists of a mixture of about 60% RDX and 40% TNT with 1% added paraffin wax. That’s not just shits and giggles.

This is chemistry at the scary end of the pool. RDX (left) and TNT (right).

RDX is somewhat less well known to the average person than TNT, probably thanks to the ubiquitous use of the latter throughout Looney Tunes cartoons.

The Legendary Wile. E. Coyote. He probably blows up shortly after this.

RDX stands for Research Department Explosive (how original!), it is a nitroamine that’s been used to blow stuff up the world over since its first usage in the Second World War. It’s actually more powerful than TNT and was discovered in 1898 by German chemist Georg Friedrich Henning. It was manufactured, by nitrating hexamine nitrate (hexamethylenetetramine nitrate) with concentrated nitric acid. This is something I’d not recommend doing if you fancy going home with all of your limbs attached.

RDX is also known as cyclonite, hexogen (particularly in Germany), and T4. Its chemical name is cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine is rather a mouthful and slightly boring.

In pure form, RDX is a white, crystalline solid that is actually pretty stable to store at room temperature. You’d probably not give it a second look if it were sitting on your desk, but it is considered one of the most powerful and brisant (i.e. rapid shock wave building) military grade explosives available.

TNT is an abbreviation of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene. It’s a yellow coloured solid and is pretty much the best known explosive in the world (as previously mentioned). It does have other uses in chemical synthesis, such as making charge transfer salts, but I doubt Batman has the time to be doing that. It was first prepared in 1863 by yet another German chemist Julius Wilbrand and looks pretty innocuous.

This is TNT. Not your breakfast cereal.

 

Its great value is that it’s pretty insensitive to shock and friction, which means it isn’t going to accidently blow Batman up, when he’s attempting something cool.

TNT is certainly more stable than this fiery little shock sensitive compound below:

I don’t like to be touched.

Nitroglycerin. I’m not going to talk about this very much, but it’s worth a read, particularly as it’s bad (but somewhat deserved) reputation, hides the fact that it’s now being used to treat heart conditions and prostate cancer. Oh and it was one of Alfred Nobel’s crowning achievements. Yes. THAT Alfred Nobel

 Going back to TNT, it easily melts at 80 °C (or 176 °F for you Americans out there, and 353 Kelvin for you Chemistry snobs), without detonating so it can be poured safely and combined with other explosives like RDX. It’s water insoluble so can be used on those boring rainy days.

Note that TNT is NOT found in dynamite, which is an absorbent mixture soaked in our friend above, nitroglycerin, and then compressed into a cylinder and wrapped in paper. In addition, TNT is poisonous, and causes the skin to become irritated and turn a bright yellow-orange colour. Munition workers who handled TNT during the First World War acquired the nickname “canary girls” due to their handling of the substance. Again, this did not result in any superpowers.

You hear that Sinestro? Yellow isn’t a superpower.

Batman uses further explosives in The Dark Knight in the form of sticky bombs which he shoots from a rather fabulous looking gun.

Doesn’t that look all high-tech and futuristic?

One can assume that the explosive here are actually working on the same principal but with timers. The sticky substance looks pretty translucent and thus could be a a simple adhesive, which is another potentially massive chemistry blog post in itself. It could also be a future, (i.e. better) version of the US militaries “hilarious” sticky foam.

What the substance certainly doesn’t appear to be is that Hollywood staple, the traditional, well known plastic explosive  C4 (which IS used by villians in the Dark Knight Trilogy).

C4 is what Keanu and Sandra are worried about. That’s a totally different film.

C4 – is another composition (namly Composition C, the fourth one in that series) which contains 91% RDX and aplasticiser such as diethylhexyl sebacate (about 5%) and a binder, which is usually polyisobutylene (about 2%).C4 however, is an off-white solid with a texture similar to modelling clay and not at all like the stuff Batman shoots out of his fancy Bat-gun.

That grey stuff is C4.

Incapacitating agents

There’s a scene in the Dark Knight Rises where Batman takes out a few of Banes henchmen with what can only be described as Bat-Darts.

Bat-darts! They look very darty!

One assumes that these darts are tipped with some form of incapacitating agent, one that is non-lethal, in keeping with Batman’s no-kill ethos (with exception of the Al Ghul family, it would seem.)

This is actually harder than it seems. Films/TV/comics/books are full of awful pseudoscience (or rather “artistic license”), most is forgiveable.

Instant sedation in TV/film is usually achieved, by use of a tranquillizer dart. A pointed projectile is shot, thrown, or blown at from a distance, usually into the neck or the arse (for laughs). A sedative is either on the dart tip or contained in an syringe attached to the dart.

This generally puts  the target to sleep near instantly. Of course…

Jeff Goldblum everybody.

In large part because the same dose doesn’t work on everyone (we aren’t all the same shape and size) and sedatives work differently on different people (we all have slightly different body chemistry). Drugs are far more complex than the movies give them credit for. Below for instance is a selection of common tranquillizers and sedatives.

A fine range of compounds each with strong pharmacological properties. Smell the chemistry.

All of the above are highly potent compounds, for example, Etorphine is 1,000-3,000 times more potent than morphine and is therefore only used to sedate large animals such as elephants….

Huh?

If you search for “surprised elephant” on google. You get a picture of Lionel Richie. I kid you not. “Hello, is it me you’re looking for?” No Lionel. It really isn’t.

Anyway, etorphine will kill human beings (even Mr. Richie) and is therefore sold only to vets along with the antidote for humans diprenorphine. Just in case.

In fact, pretty much all of the above will kill a human if the correct dosage isn’t used and that’s not something the Dark Knight can be trying to gauge in the middle of a fight.

So tranquillizers are out. Surely there are other agents though right? Well, not many that have been applied to military type uses, such as knocking out your enemies. In fact, there are a grand total of four. One of which, has an unknown structure because the Russians don’t like to share such things.

I have no idea what you mean…

One of these agents is the fantastically named Agent 15 (aka BZ, which you can tell was weaponised by the US Army in the 1960s right?) causes nervous system effects, including and not limited to stupor, mumbling, blurred vision, irrational fear, elevated blood pressure, confusion, panoramic illusions and hallucinations and regressive ‘phantom behaviours’ such as plucking hair and undressing without provocation.

Agent 15’s response is always. “No comment”.

Its related to atropine, and other deliriants and is dispersed as an aerosolized solid (primarily for inhalation) or as agent dissolved in one or more solvents for ingestion or absorption via a needle puncture like how our Bat friend would do.

You know the more you hear about this the more it sounds like something a certain Doctor Crane used in Batman Begins.

The Scarecrow.

If Batman is having trouble getting the mix right he’d just be better off slipping the bad guys some LSD in a club or something?

Lucius Fox: You planning on gassing yourself again, Mr Wayne?
Bruce Wayne: Well, you know how it is, Mr Fox. You’re out at night, looking for kicks, someone’s passing around the weaponized hallucinogens.

See? Bruce is down with the kids.

Cold fusion generator

This thing just shouts, “IMPRESSIVE SCIENCE INSIDE” doesn’t it?

Okay, I’m wrapping things up now with a bit of a non-gadget.

If there is a part of The Dark Knight Rises that I don’t particularly like, it’s the whole idea that Bruce Wayne built an entire fusion (I’m assuming it’s a cold one here) generator and then proceeds to just do nothing with it…except leave it there so that Bane can use it for his own nefarious purposes. This is despite Bruce knowing that the device could be used as a bomb. That’s remarkably irresponsible of our Mr. Wayne and Lucius Fox didn’t exactly pull the plug either.

He’s Batman though, so I’m sure he has a perfectly good excuse.

Bruce and Lucius having a good laugh about how they could totally destroy the world with that thing in the basement.

Fusion is quite complicated but it’s simply put, its the process by which two or more atomic nuclei are fused together to form a new heavier nucleus. For example:

Matter is not conserved in this process and is instead converted into energy. It’s difficult to achieve and above all maintain, it requires huge pressures and extremely high temperatures, the kind you find in stars.

Fusing like a boss.

I’m not a physicist (or even a physical chemist) so I’m not really doing the topic a great service here (but click here to find a slightly better take on the subject) and it’s not really a gadget so to speak, but I wanted to include it as a tribute to the late Martin Fleischmann, who sadly passed away this year.

Martin Fleischmann – co-“inventor” of cold fusion.

Fleischmann is rather infamous for his pronouncement in1989 with Stanley Pons that they had cracked “Cold Fusion” – the ability to perform a fusion reaction without the need for star level temperatures. The apparently produced excess heat in a reaction that they believed could only be explained by a nuclear process, it was a small tabletop experiment that involved the electrolysis of D2O a palladium (Pd) electrode.

This got people all excited for a little while. Many other scientists called “bullshit” and that’s what it turned out to be as nobody could replicate the results. Pons and Fleischman later discovered flaws in their method and experimental errors that destroyed the whole idea. So within the space of a year cold fusion was dead.

My current Post doc boss has told me a few great stories about the man when he was at the University of Southampton; such as the occasion that he burst into a tutorial to proclaiming that he had “solved” the cold fusion problem and promptly started writing it up on the board much to the surprise of the students!

Wrapping up

So thanks for making it this far and reading my rather rambling blogs about Batman. I hope that you enjoyed reading them as much as I did writing them. Feel free to drop me a comments/complaints or any suggestions for future chemistry in film/TV blog ideas you might have.

I also apologise if I didn’t go over your favourite Batman gadget, but I think you’ll agree this blog post is pretty epically long already!

Look at this crazy stuff!

Just don’t ask me to explain the Bat-Shark Repellent okay? Nobody knows how that stuff works.

Go bother Adam West, okay?

Bat’s all folks!

-Doctor Galactic-

Trip the light fantastic.

Alert! Alert! Shameless plug for my own chemistry contained within!

I would be totally missing an opportunity if I didn’t blog about some chemistry that is very close to my heart, so here’s a little ode to my PhD work. My thesis a.k.a the bane of my life for three whole months that consumed every single waking hour, until my brain felt like it had been pulverised into the ground…*ahem*  …what was I saying?

Oh yes, my thesis was entitled “The Double [3+2] Photocycloaddition reaction“.

I’m sure some of you will have quickly beaten a retreat when you noticed the prefix “photo-” in that there sentence. Photo-chemistry is an oft maligned area of research because it can be quite a fickle mistress, that behaves in unusual ways compared to your standard thermal chemistry (those high energy states just love to do crazy shit!). There are also the many practical considerations you have to account for: purity of reagents, solvent selection, direct or sensitized irradiation (do you need a sensitizer?), the specialist equipment, quantum yield measurements (which are a pain in the behind I can tell you) and the hazards of high energy UV radiation.

Of course, none of this should put you off, because what you can do with photo-chemistry is pretty darn marvelous. You see, one of synthetic organic chemistry’s greatest challenges is to create step-efficient routes toward compounds with high molecular complexity (i.e. to make something complex as possible in as few a steps possible). Therefore, reactions which provide more than one bond in a single step are of significant importance (see the Diels-Alder reaction).

In my own work we reported an intriguing case of a double [3+2] photocycloaddition reaction that resulted in the formation of a complex cis, cis, cis, trans-[5, 5, 5, 5] fenestrane derivative  from a simple aromatic acetal as shown in scheme 1.

Scheme 1 An example depicting the photochemical  reactions of arenyl-diene photosubstrate, including the double [3+2] photocycloaddition reaction.

During this transformation, four carbon-carbon bonds, five new rings and seven potentially new stereocenters are created in an essentially one-pot process using only UV light (at 254 nm). Here’s an X-ray crystall structure of it, because X-ray crystal structures always make your chemistry 100% more legit:

You can’t dispute this little beauty.

The reaction actually occurs in a sequential manner from the linear meta photocycloadduct (for a detailed review of the meta photocycloaddition reaction click here or here), via a secondary [3+2] addition of the alkene across the cyclopropane of the adduct. In addition, an angular meta photocycloadduct also produced in the initial addition step, undergoes an alternative fragmentation-translocation photoreaction to afford an angular triquinane compound. Scheme 2 gives a little idea of mechanistic stuff.

Scheme 2: A mechanistic summary of the reactions involved in the irradiation of the linear meta photocycloadduct.

We also produced a series of other fenestranes (including my favourite nitrogen containing variant) through the same method which can be found in our follow-up paper in JOC. I think we really only scratched the surface of this chemistry, but due to a set of unfortunate circumstances which I’d rather not recollect, the work has had to cease for the time being. I’d like to go back to it some day because it’s quite a unique area.

Fenestranes are quite rare in nature and their synthetic utility is pretty much untapped, but they’ve got bags of potential as possible agrochemicals, chiral auxiliaries, scaffolds, pharmaceuticals and materials. They compare favorably to the steroid class of compound in that they are both conformationally rigid and chemically robust. The real problem with them is the are hard to make (although not using our method)

A selection of naturally occurring fenestranes. Pretty aren’t they?

Penifulvin A shown above actually has notable insecticidal properties, whereas asperaculin was only recently isolated, but being a fungal metabolite it may also prove useful. Laurenene unfortunately is totally useless, but it certainly looks the part!

If you really wanted to see all the nonsense I got up to in my PhD, I have just discovered that you can buy my thesis on Amazon…which feels a bit weird. It’s still pretty cool that you can even buy a kindle version!

The Lab Coat Cowboy

 

Here there be dragons.

I’m still getting to grips with this whole blogging malarkey so I thought I’d give it yet another go today.

Something massive happened to today.

Yes. That’s right….

I used tertiary butyllithium for the first time at the age of 27, in the second year of my post doc. 

I know, I know, this is heavy. I can see you need a sit down now. I’ll get you some tea/coffee/cider/beer/other in a minute.

Truth be told, I’ve heard enough bad stories about tert-BuLi over the years that I’ve pretty much done my best to avoid it whenever I could. However, seeing as Grignard failed me the other day, I was forced to turn to lithiation and when it was suggested to me that tert-BuLi might do the trick, I thought “why the hell not?”.

So here is my reaction vessel (argon balloon not shown):

The foil is there to potential stop t-BuLi dropping into the acetone/CO2 bath. Not just to make it pretty…

And a handy message on the fumehood:

A comical safety message. Before you jump on me, there was a proper safety notice placed on the fumehood out of shot as well.

To be fair to tert-BuLi (because chemicals have feelings just like people?) when under an inert atmosphere its more happy, and by the point above it had already done its business. However, it’s one of those chemicals that should never be underestimated. Just look at the hazard symbols:

Chemists should all be aware of what these mean. I miss the old orange and black ones personally.

Basically, *deep breathe* it’s highly flammable, spontaneously catches fire in air, liberates flammable gases in contact with water (which will likely ignite), may be fatal if swallowed/inhaled, causes severe burns in contact with the eyes or skin and to top it all it’s very “dead fish, dead tree” (as we call it in the laboratory – aren’t we witty?).

Suffice to say that it’s a chemical you should show great respect and the utmost care in using. There have been a number of high profile laboratory accidents involving tert-butyllithium over the years. In particular the recent (2009) tragic case of Sheharbano Sangji in the lab of Patrick Harran at the UCLA, who died after being severely burned while working with tert-butyllithium when her synthetic sweater caught on fire. I don’t think that there is a chemist who shouldn’t read about what happened in that case and a very detailed explaination can be found here via Chemistry and Engineering news.

Every single university has it’s own safety rules and every single laboratory has its own safety practices and every single researcher has their own way of working. These three aspects do not always mesh very well, especially (as I’ve discovered over the years) if the University tends to talk about safety a lot, but doesn’t have a budget to act upon aforementioned talk.

I asked for advice today on how to use tert-butyllithium, as you’ve probably surmised I’m not a cavalier when it comes to my approach to chemical safety and I’m pretty sure if anything went wrong everyone in the laboratory would have known what to do.

I think the take away message is…Always play it safe with chemicals you’ve never used before. Do your homework. Check your hazards. Take all the necessary precautions.

In other  news….

Oh. The physicsts at CERN might have pretty much found that Higgs Boson thing that they and the whole world has been obsessing over for years. Don’t let it be said that I don’t pay attention to the bigger picture.

-The Lab Coat Cowboy-